Enhancing Student Engagement and Learning Outcomes in Primary Schools: Effective Strategies for Primary School Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63034/esr-83Keywords:
student engagement, learning outcomes, primary school, effective strategiesAbstract
This article examines the critical role of student engagement in primary school education and its direct influence on learning outcomes. It explores a range of effective strategies that primary school teachers can utilize to enhance student engagement, including the implementation of interactive teaching methodologies, the integration of technology into classroom activities, the cultivation of positive teacher-student relationships, and the creation of a supportive learning environment. Additionally, the article underscores the significance of continuous professional development in assisting teachers to effectively implement these strategies. By incorporating these strategies, primary school teachers can create a more engaging and enriching learning experience, thus improving overall student learning outcomes.
References
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. ASCD.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399
Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2013). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.
Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of educational psychology, 102(3), 588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019682
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., Whitt, E. J., & Associates. (2010). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. John Wiley & Sons.
Reeves, D. B. (2010). Transforming professional development into student results. ASCD.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and teacher education, 17(7), 783-805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Richter, D., Voss, T., & Hachfeld, A. (2013). Professional competence of teachers: Effects on instructional quality and student development. Journal of educational psychology, 105(3), 805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032583
National Research Council. (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press.
Hammond, Z. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin Press.
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. ASCD.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher learning: What matters? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46-53.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Turlybekova Saule Turgynovna
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
