THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE: ASSESSING EMPLOYMENT, SOCIAL DYNAMICS, AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS IN CHINA AND KAZAKHSTAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63034/esr-456Keywords:
Belt and Road Initiative, Employment, Economic development, Social dynamics, Environmental impactsAbstract
The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) has had significant socio-economic impacts on local communities in China and Kazakhstan. This study examines these impacts, focusing on employment, economic development, social dynamics, and environmental sustainability. In China, the BRI has driven economic growth and job creation, particularly in less developed regions like Xinjiang. However, rapid urbanization and the influx of workers have led to cultural shifts and tensions among ethnic minorities. The environmental consequences of BRI projects, such as deforestation and habitat destruction, have prompted the Chinese government to implement green development initiatives. Similarly, Kazakhstan has benefited from job creation and economic diversification, with the Khorgos Gateway becoming a critical trade hub. However, social challenges, including wealth disparities and the marginalization of rural populations, have emerged. Environmental concerns, such as land degradation and pollution, have led the Kazakh government to introduce stricter regulations. While the BRI has brought substantial economic benefits to both countries, these gains must be carefully managed to mitigate the associated social and environmental risks. Balancing economic progress with the preservation of cultural heritage and environmental protection remains a complex challenge. As the BRI evolves, China and Kazakhstan must develop strategies that address these issues, ensuring that the benefits of the initiative are maximized while minimizing the negative impacts on local communities.
References
An, H., Liu, L., Wang, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Nexus between green logistic operations and triple bottom line: Evidence from infrastructure-led Chinese outward foreign direct investment in Belt and Road host countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 28822–28839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09274-w
Clarke, M. (2018). China's ‘War on Terror’ in Xinjiang: Human Security and the Causes of Violent Uighur Separatism. Routledge.
Elish, E., & Aboelsoud, M. (2024). Assessing the Belt and Road Initiative’s environmental footprint: An impact evaluation analysis of African member countries. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02539-x
Foggin, J. M., Chaudhary, R. P., Xu, J., & Guttal, S. (2021). Belt and Road Initiative in Central Asia: Anticipating socioecological challenges from large‐scale infrastructure in a global biodiversity hotspot. Conservation Letters, 14(4), e12852. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12852
Kassenova, N. (2017). China's Silk Road and Kazakhstan's Bright Path: Linking dreams and realities. Asia Policy, 24(1), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1353/asp.2017.0025
Laruelle, M. (2018). Kazakhstan’s Emerging Middle Class: A Key Actor in the Nation’s Modernization? Central Asia Program, Institute for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies.
Losos, E., Pfaff, A., Olander, L., Mason, S., & Morgan, A. (2019). Reducing environmental risks from Belt and Road Initiative investments in transportation infrastructure (Policy brief). Duke University. https://nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/publications/reducing-environmental-risks-belt-and-road-initiative-investments-transportation
National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) of China. (2019). BRI Economic Benefits and Poverty Reduction in China. Beijing: NDRC.
Shakib, M., Saeed, T., & Balsalobre-Lorente, D. (2021). Revisiting the energy-economy-environment relationships for attaining environmental sustainability: Evidence from Belt and Road Initiative countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(25), 32791–32806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12929-2
Wang, B., & Wang, Z. (2023). Innovation capability, global cooperation, and sustainable development along the Belt and Road Initiative. Sustainable Development, 31(3), 1360–1372. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2433
World Bank. (2019). Kazakhstan: Economic impacts of the Belt and Road Initiative. Washington, DC: World Bank Group.
Zhou, N., & Esteban, M. (2018). Environmental impact assessment for China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Environmental Development, 28, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2018.09.002
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 FENG JIANHUI

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.