METHODOLOGY FOR THE FORMATION OF THE EDUCATIONAL BASE OF STEM IN THE PREPARATION OF FUTURE BIOLOGY TEACHERS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63034/esr-15

Keywords:

STEM Integration, Biology, Interdisciplinary Teaching, Teacher Training, Educational Methodology, Project-Based Learning, Professional Development

Abstract

The contemporary educational landscape necessitates the integration of science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) into the preparation of future biology teachers. This study presents a comprehensive methodology for establishing a robust educational base in STEM, tailored to the specific needs of biology teacher training. Recognizing the interdisciplinary nature of STEM and its growing significance in biology education, this research employs a mixed-methods approach to explore effective strategies for embedding STEM principles within the biology teacher curriculum. The methodology encompasses both quantitative and qualitative analyses, utilizing surveys and interviews with teacher educators and STEM experts. The research highlights a significant gap in current teacher education programs regarding STEM integration, underscoring the need for innovative teaching methods such as project-based learning and collaborative educational models. These approaches aim to enhance the proficiency of future biology teachers in both STEM concepts and their application in educational settings. The findings suggest that a holistic and integrated approach to STEM education is imperative for developing future teachers who are not only well-versed in biological sciences but also skilled in the pedagogical application of STEM principles. The study emphasizes the importance of continuous professional development and institutional support for teacher educators to facilitate this integration. The proposed methodology offers a strategic framework for effectively incorporating STEM into biology teacher education, fostering a generation of educators equipped to navigate and teach in an increasingly interdisciplinary academic environment.

References

Becker, K., & Park, K. (2011). Effects of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12(5-6), 23-37.

Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. ASCD.

Brown, T., & Green, A. (2017). Barriers to STEM education in secondary schools: Perspectives of teachers and administrators. Journal of STEM Education, 18(1), 29-39.

Fang, N. (2016). Overcoming disciplinary boundaries in STEM education: A challenge for teacher training. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 53(1), 12-21.

Garcia, E., & Ortiz, A. (2021). Longitudinal effects of STEM integrated teacher training. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(2), 232-256.

Hughes, R., & Ellefson, N. (2013). Inquiry-based STEM curriculum: Aligning with real-world problems. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 70-74.

Johnson, A. (2015). Interdisciplinary STEM teaching: Bridging the gap between science and practice. Journal of Science Education, 20(3), 45-60.

Johnson, D., et al. (2018). Enhancing biology learning through digital tools and resources. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 465-481.

Lee, C. (2019). Impact of professional development on STEM integration: A case study. Journal of Educational Research, 31(4), 345-359.

Patel, D., & Patel, P. (2020). STEM education: A comparative study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(7), 1239-1254.

Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20-26.

Smith, L., & Johnson, M. (2016). The impact of integrated STEM education on biology learning. Journal of Biological Education, 50(2), 123-137.

Thompson, S., & Goeckel, R. (2020). Professional development in STEM: A critical review. Teacher Education Quarterly, 47(1), 44-68.

Turner, S. (2017). Professional development for STEM teachers: Challenges and opportunities. Teacher Development, 21(2), 223-237.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, H. (2018). Assessing interdisciplinary learning: Challenges and solutions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 887-900.

Wang, X., & Lin, L. (2019). Global perspectives on STEM education. Science Education International, 30(1), 31-39.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-07

How to Cite

BAKIROVA, A. (2023). METHODOLOGY FOR THE FORMATION OF THE EDUCATIONAL BASE OF STEM IN THE PREPARATION OF FUTURE BIOLOGY TEACHERS. Eurasian Science Review An International Peer-Reviewed Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(4). https://doi.org/10.63034/esr-15