ARTIFICIAL IN POLITICAL DECISION MAKING THE ROLE OF INTELLIGENCE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63034/esr-237Keywords:
Data analysis, Policy modeling, Resource allocation, inequality, Bias, ManipulationAbstract
The role of artificial intelligence in political decision-making was considered in the article.Nowadays, in the age of highly developed technologies, advanced countries like Singapore, Korea, and Japan are using artificial intelligence in political decision-making to make important decisions such as social and economic city planning, smart city project.The benefits and harms of this process and how we can avoid the risks are discussed comprehensively in this article, data analysis framework, Policy modeling, Transparency and accountability. determines ways of implementation of management. We see some countries moving from "soft regulation" through strategies and guidelines to "hard regulation" through rule-making and AI laws. We argue that their ways of governing AI are heavily influenced by existing internet governance structures and suggest the importance of historical understandings of the Internet, telecommunications and digital technologies and governance to identify connections and impacts and the 'path dependence' of past policies. current AI strategies and management. We analyze various projects related to the AI regulatory landscape in Asia, the global AI competition between the EU, China and the US, as well as the pragmatic paths that many Asian countries may take, given their history, economics and politics.
References
Aaronson, S.A. (2020). Data Governance, AI, and Trade: A Case Study of Asia. IDEAS Working Paper Series, 2020-6, offered by RePEc. George Washington University, Institute for International Economic Policy. Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/gwi/wpaper/2020-6.html.
AI Thailand. (2022). Thailand National AI Strategy and Action Plan (2022–2027). Retrieved from https://ai.in.th/en/about-ai-thailand/.
Ariffin, A.S., Maavak, M., Dolah, R., & Muhtazaruddin, M.N. (2023). Building the Foundations of AI Governance and Ethics to Support Responsible AI Adoption in Malaysia. Res Militaris, 13(3), 2491–2516.
ASEAN Guidelines on AI Governance and Ethics. (2024). Retrieved from https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ASEAN-Guide-on-AI-Governance-and-Ethics_beautified_201223_v2.pdf.
Aseri, V. (2023, December 16). The Symbiotic Relationship Between AI and Internet Governance in India. CyberPeace. Retrieved from
Asia-Pacific AI Readiness Index. (2023). Asia-Pacific AI Readiness Index 2023. Salesforce. Retrieved from
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Economic Policymaking. Retrieved from
https://www.apec.org/publications/2022/11/artificial-intelligence-in-economic-policymaking.
Today Asia. (2021, January 13). Li Luda’s Chatbot Raises Ethical Concerns Around AI. Retrieved from
https://en.asiatoday.co.kr/view.php?key=20210112002141234.
Au, A. (2023, October 19). China and the US Approaches to AI Governance. The Diplomat. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2023/10/china-vs-us-approaches-to-ai-governance/.
Australian Government. (2024, February 13). Australia and Singapore Show Compatibility Between AI Governance Frameworks. Retrieved from
Buren, E., Chew, B., & Eggers, W. (2020). Governments’ AI Readiness: Are You Ready for AI? Retrieved from
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Taskul Talgat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.