The technology of "Debate" in history lessons: the conditions of occurrence, the technique of conducting, educational opportunities.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63034/esr-101Keywords:
Debate Technology, Educational Pedagogy, Classroom Management, Critical Thinking, Student Engagement, Active LearningAbstract
The integration of debate as a pedagogical technology in educational settings has gained significant attention for its potential to enhance critical thinking, communication skills, and student engagement. This paper examines the historical development of the "Debate" methodology in classroom settings, focusing on the conditions that facilitated its emergence and the management techniques required for its successful implementation. It explores the educational opportunities provided by debate, including fostering a deeper understanding of subject matter, promoting active learning, and encouraging diverse perspectives. Through a comprehensive analysis of case studies and existing literature, this study identifies best practices for managing debate technology in lessons and highlights the impact of debate on student learning outcomes. The findings underscore the importance of structured debate formats, teacher facilitation, and supportive classroom environments in maximizing the educational benefits of this interactive teaching approach.
References
Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
Bonwell, C.C., & Eison, J.A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
Brookfield, S.D., & Preskill, S. (1999). Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Collins, J.W., & O'Brien, N.P. (Eds.). (2011). The Greenwood Dictionary of Education. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO.
Cruickshank, D.R., Jenkins, D.B., & Metcalf, K.K. (2009). The Act of Teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
D'Angelo, F.J. (1971). Process and Thought in Composition. Cambridge: Winthrop Publishers.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.
Garrison, J.W. (2003). Dewey and Eros: Wisdom and Desire in the Art of Teaching. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Giroux, H.A. (1988). Teachers as Intellectuals: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of Learning. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.
Haroutunian-Gordon, S. (2009). Learning to Teach Through Discussion: The Art of Turning the Soul. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.
Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Holubec, E.J. (1994). The New Circles of Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom and School. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Lambert, L. (2002). A Framework for Shared Leadership. Educational Leadership, 59(8), 37-40.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts and Tools. Dillon Beach: Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-12-05 (2)
- 2024-06-03 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kamradinov Erzhan Kirkimbaevich
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
