PEDAGOGICAL MODEL FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE OF FUTURE TEACHERS OF NATURAL SCIENCE BASED ON SPEECH SIMULATORS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63034/esr-766Keywords:
foreign language communicative competence, future teachers, natural science education, speech simulators, digital learning technologiesAbstract
This article presents a pedagogical model for the development of foreign language communicative competence of future teachers of natural sciences through the use of speech simulators. In the context of educational digitalization and competency-based learning, speech simulators are considered an effective technological tool for improving students’ language proficiency, professional communication skills, and interactive learning experience. The proposed model integrates pedagogical principles, digital technologies, and communicative teaching approaches to enhance speaking, listening, reading, and writing skills in authentic professional contexts. The study outlines the structural components of the model, including objectives, content, methods, digital resources, assessment criteria, and expected learning outcomes. The implementation of speech simulators promotes learner autonomy, motivation, critical thinking, and confidence in professional communication.
References
1.Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1
2.Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford University Press.
3. Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
4.Huang, H.-T. D. (2021). Fostering foreign language communicative competence through communicative language teaching: Evidence from English as a foreign language classrooms. Education Sciences, 11(11), Article 723. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110723
5.Wei, L. (2022). Technology-enhanced language learning: Effects of digital tools on learner motivation and engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 833694. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.833694
6. Pradana, M., Syarifudin, S., & Setiawan, A. (2022). Computer-assisted language learning and digital technologies in English language education: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11579–11605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11010-5
7. Lee, J., Lee, H., & Kim, N. (2023). Digital language learning platforms and foreign language communicative competence: A review of recent evidence. Sustainability, 15(9), Article 7201. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097201
8.Koleini, F., Mohammadi, E., & Rahimi, M. (2024). Online technologies for teaching English for specific purposes: Vocabulary development and communicative competence. Education Sciences, 14(2), Article 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020164
9.Son, J.-B. (2016). Computer-assisted language learning: Learners, teachers and tools. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
10.Teng, M. F., & Wang, C. (2021). The effects of technology-enhanced language learning on student engagement and achievement: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 34, Article 100404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100404
11.Zhang, Z. (2022). Developing teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge for digital language teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 914365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.914365
12.Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and language integrated learning in bilingual and multilingual education. Macmillan Education.
13.Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Darya Antontseva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
