EFFECTIVE METHODS OF TEACHING LITERARY WORKS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63034/esr-732

Keywords:

literary work, literary education, working with texts, interactive teaching methods, critical thinking, creative ability, literary analysis

Abstract

This article examines effective methods of teaching literary works from pedagogical and methodological perspectives. It emphasizes the importance of considering students’ age and cognitive characteristics, using interactive methods aimed at deep engagement with the text, and prioritizing the development of critical thinking and creative abilities. The effectiveness of approaches such as problem-based questions, role-playing, debates, interpretive analysis of texts, and the use of digital educational resources in literary analysis is highlighted. The author notes that unlocking the educational, aesthetic, and cognitive potential of literary texts plays a crucial role in shaping students’ spiritual and moral values. The research findings provide methodological recommendations aimed at improving the quality of literary education and modernizing the teaching process.

References

Abilkassimova, K. K. (2018). Methods of Teaching Kazakh Literature. Almaty: Bilim. – 256 p.

Zhumabayev, M. (2016). Pedagogy. Almaty: Rauan. – 192 p.

Kaliev, S., & Zharikbaev, K. (2015). Kazakh Education and Upbringing. Almaty: Sanat. – 320 p.

Konyratbaev, A. (2014). Fundamentals of Teaching Literature Methods. Almaty: Mektep. – 240 p.

Nurgali, R. (2019). Literary Theory. Almaty: Kazakh University. – 368 p.

Syzdyk, R. (2017). The Power of Words. Almaty: Sanat. – 272 p.

Tursynov, E. D. (2020). Technologies for Teaching Kazakh Literature. Almaty: Arys. – 214 p.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: Longman. – 207 p.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-17

How to Cite

Kilybayeva , G. (2026). EFFECTIVE METHODS OF TEACHING LITERARY WORKS. Eurasian Science Review An International Peer-Reviewed Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(1), 837–841. https://doi.org/10.63034/esr-732